Panel Peer Review of PHMSA Pipeline Safety Research Projects: 2011

R&D Menu


The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) Pipeline Safety Research and Development (R&D) Program is holding annual structured peer reviews of active research projects since 2006 in accordance with mandates by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) to maintain research data quality. PHMSA holds these reviews virtually via teleconference and the Internet saving time and resources. This execution is also working well with panelists, researchers, Agreement Officers’ Technical Representatives and project co-sponsors. Most impressively, the PHMSA approach facilitates attendance from all U.S. time zones, Canada and Europe.

The annual peer review continues to build on an already strong and systematic evaluation process developed by PHMSA’s Pipeline Safety R&D Program and certified by the Government Accountability Office. The 2011 peer review panel consisted of nine government and independent experts. Three panelists were active Government representatives from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and from the Department of Energy Biomass Program. The remaining six panelists were independent contractors and retired Government or retired pipeline operator employees some of which play vital roles as peers for the American Petroleum Institute, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the National Association of Corrosion Engineers and other standards developing organizations.

Thirty-three active research projects were peer reviewed by expert panelists using 13 evaluation criteria. These criteria were grouped within the following five evaluation categories:

  1. Project relevance to the PHMSA mission.
  2. Project management.
  3. Approach taken for transferring results to end users.
  4. Project coordination with other closely related programs.
  5. Quality of project results.

The rating scale possibilities were "Ineffective," "Moderately Effective," "Effective," or "Very Effective." During the April 2011 review, the average program rating between all the evaluation categories was “Very Effective.” For this year, 24 projects were rated “Very Effective” with 9 projects ranked as “Effective.” The average sub-criteria scoring were also rated very high and underpin these findings. The majority of peered projects and the overall program rating remain “Very Effective” since the initial reviews in 2006. Additional details are available in Section 7 and Tables 4, 5 and in Appendix C of the below report.

Rating Scale
Very Effective4.5 to 5.0 (24 Projects)
Effective3.0 to 4.4 (9 Projects)
Moderately Effective2.0 to 2.9 (0 Projects)
Ineffective0.0 to 1.9 (0 Projects)
Average Program Score4.6

Program Averages - Review Categories and Sub-Criteria
Review Categories and Sub-Criteria Score Rating
1. Project relevance to PHMSA mission. 4.7 Very Effective
  1.1. How well does the project illustrate its relevance for enhancing pipeline safety and or protecting the environment? 4.7 Very Effective
  1.2. How well does the project describe its relevance to research program goals (technology, consensus standard or produce general knowledge)? 4.7 Very Effective
2. Project Management. 4.5 Very Effective
  2.1. How well is the project making progress toward the work scope objectives? 4.5 Very Effective
  2.2. How well is the project being managed (on budget and schedule)? 4.4 Effective
3. Approach taken for transferring results to end users. 4.6 Very Effective
  3.1. Is there a plan for dissemination of results, including publications and reporting? 4.6 Very Effective
  3.2. How much end user involvement is incorporated into the work scope? 4.6 Very Effective
  3.3. For results that may include marketable products and technologies, are commercialization or U.S. Patent plans established? 4.5 Very Effective
4. Project coordination with other related programs. 4.6 Very Effective
  4.1. Does the project build on, or make use of, related or prior work? 4.8 Very Effective
  4.2. Is the work of the project being communicated to other related research efforts? 4.5 Very Effective
  4.3. Has consideration been given to possible future work? 4.4 Effective
5. Quality of project results. 4.6 Very Effective
  5.1. Are the intended results supported by the work performed during the project? 4.5 Very Effective
  5.2. Are the intended results consistent with scientific knowledge and/or engineering principles? 4.7 Very Effective
  5.3. Are the intended results presented in such a manner as to be useful for identified end users? 4.5 Very Effective
Average Category Score and Rating: 4.6 Very Effective

Project Rankings
Project Rank Contract Project Title Score Rating
203 1 DTPH56-06-T-000016 Development of Dual Field MFL Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage 5.0 Very Effective
294 1 DTPH56-09-T-000005 Performance Evaluation of High-Strength Steel Pipelines for High-Pressure Gaseous Hydrogen Transportation 5.0 Very Effective
296 1 DTPH56-09-T-000004 Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels in Fuel Grade Ethanol and Blends 5.0 Very Effective
235 2 DTPH56-08-T-000009 Meandering Winding Magnetometer-Array Detection & Characterization of Damage through Coatings and Insulation 4.9 Very Effective
358 2 DTPH56-10-T-000013 Dent Fatigue Life Assessment - Development of Tools for Assessing the Severity and Life of Dent Features 4.9 Very Effective
236 3 DTPH56-08-T-000009 Adaptation of MWM Array and MFL Technology for Enhanced Detection/Characterization of Damage from Inside Pipelines 4.8 Very Effective
351 3 DTPH56-10-T-000006 Landfill and Wastewater Treatment RNG Chemical and Physical Profiling: Increasing the Database Set 4.8 Very Effective
176 4 DTPH56-05-T-0001 Understanding Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Signals from Mechanical Damage in Pipelines 4.7 Very Effective
295 4 DTPH56-09-T-000003 New Design and Construction Techniques for Transportation of Ethanol and Ethanol/Gasoline Blends in New Pipelines 4.7 Very Effective
320 4 DTPH56-10-T-000004 Technical and Economic Feasibility of Preventing SCC through Control of Oxygen 4.7 Very Effective
322 4 DTPH56-10-T-000005 Compatibility of Non-Ferrous Metals with Ethanol 4.7 Very Effective
354 4 DTPH56-10-T-000009 Meandering Winding Magnetometer Array Characterization of Mechanical Damage and Corrosion 4.7 Very Effective
363 4 DTPH56-10-T-000018 Odorant Effectiveness 4.7 Very Effective
229 5 DTPH56-08-T-000001 Development of a Commercial Model to Predict Stress Corrosion Cracking Growth Rates in Operating Pipelines 4.6 Very Effective
293 5 DTPH56-09-T-000002 Modeling of Microbial Induced Corrosion on Metallic Pipelines Resulting from Biomethane & the Integrity Impact of Biomethane on Non-Metallic Pipelines 4.6 Very Effective
353 5 DTPH56-10-T-000008 Completion of Development of Robotics Systems for Inspecting Unpiggable Transmission Pipelines 4.6 Very Effective
356 5 DTPH56-10-T-000011 Integrated Internal Inspection and Cleaning Tool Technology for Pipelines 4.6 Very Effective
367 5 DTPH56-10-T-000022 Development and Field Testing of a Highly Sensitive Mercaptans Instrument 4.6 Very Effective
321 6 DTPH56-10-T-000003 Feasibility of Chemical Inhibition of Ethanol SCC 4.5 Very Effective
352 6 DTPH56-10-T-000007 SETTING SAFE LIMITS ON BIODIESEL CONSTITUENTS FOR PIPELINE INTEGRITY 4.5 Very Effective
359 6 DTPH56-10-T-000014 Selection of Pipe Repair Methods 4.5 Very Effective
362 6 DTPH56-10-T-000017 Fuelfinder: Remote Leak Detector for Liquid Hydrocarbons 4.5 Very Effective
365 6 DTPH56-10-T-000020 Acoustic-based Technology to Detect Buried Pipes 4.5 Very Effective
366 6 DTPH56-10-T-000021 Advanced Learning Algorithms for the Proactive Infrasonic Pipeline Evaluation Network (PIGPEN) Pipeline Encroachment Warning System 4.5 Very Effective
240 7 DTPH56-08-T-000014 Effect of Concentration and Temperature of Ethanol in Fuel Blends on Microbial and Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels 4.4 More than Effective
251 7 DTPH56-08-T-000008 Achieving Maximum Crack Remediation Effect from Optimized Hydrotesting 4.4 More than Effective
319 7 DTPH56-10-T-000002 Corrosion and Integrity Management of Biodiesel Pipelines 4.4 More than Effective
324 8 DTPH56-10-T-000001 Effect of Microstructure of Pipeline Steels on Ductility and Fatigue Properties in High Pressure Hydrogen Atmosphere 4.3 More than Effective
355 8 DTPH56-10-T-000010 Development of a Model to Accurately Predict the Conditions of Carrier Pipe within Casings Based on Conditions at the Casing Ends 4.3 More than Effective
364 8 DTPH56-10-T-000019 Advanced Development of PipeGuard Proactive Pipeline Damage Prevention System 4.3 More than Effective
323 9 DTPH56-10-T-000001 Cost-Effective Techniques for Weld Property Measurement and Technologies for Improving Weld Hydrogen Embrittlement and Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance for Alternative Fuel Pipelines 4.1 More than Effective
361 10 DTPH56-10-T-000016 Realistic Strain Capacity Models for Pipeline Construction and Maintenance 4.0 More than Effective
360 11 DTPH56-10-T-000015 Optimization of Multi-Wire GMAW Welding Procedure for Heavy-Wall Offshore Pipeline Construction 3.9 More than Effective