Panel Peer Review of PHMSA Pipeline Safety Research Projects: 2009

R&D Menu


The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) Pipeline Safety Research and Development (R&D) Program held its first structured peer review of active research projects in February 2006 and the most recent peer review in April 2009. Mandates by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) govern these reviews and are keeping PHMSA “Green” in addressing research data quality. Conducting these peer reviews via teleconference and the Internet is saving time and resources. It is also working well with panelists, researchers, Agreement Officers’ Technical Representatives and project co-sponsors. Most impressively, the PHMSA approach facilitates attendance from all U.S. time zones, Canada and Europe.

The peer review continues to build on an already strong and systematic evaluation process developed by PHMSA’s Pipeline Safety R&D Program and certified by the Government Accountability Office. The peer review panel consisted of twelve government and industry experts. One of the twelve panelists is an active Government representative from the Minerals Management Service. The remaining eleven panelists are retired Government and retired and active industry personnel who play vital roles as peers for the American Petroleum Institute, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the National Association of Corrosion Engineers and other standards developing organizations.

Forty-two active research projects were peer reviewed by expert panelists using 15 evaluation criteria. These criteria were grouped within the following five evaluation categories:

  1. Is the project still relevant to the PHMSA mission?
  2. Is the project still well managed?
  3. What approaches are taken for transferring results to end users?
  4. Is the project well coordinated with other closely related programs?
  5. Is the project producing high quality results?

The rating scale possibilities were "Ineffective," "Moderately Effective," "Effective," or "Very Effective." During the May 2008 review, the average program rating was “Very Effective” for each of the evaluation categories. For this year, 34 projects were rated “Very Effective” with 8 projects ranked as “Effective.” The average sub-criteria scoring were also rated very high and underpin these findings. This marks the fourth annual peer review where the majority of peered projects and the overall program rating were very effective. Additional details are available in Section 7 and Tables 4, 5 & 6 of this report.

Rating Scale
Very Effective4.5 to 5.0 (34 Projects)
Effective3.0 to 4.4 (8 Projects)
Moderately Effective2.0 to 2.9 (0 Projects)
Ineffective0.0 to 1.9 (0 Projects)
Average Program Score4.574

Program Averages - Review Categories and Sub-Criteria
Review Categories and Sub-Criteria Score Rating
1. Is the project still relevant to the PHMSA mission? 4.7 Very Effective
  1.1. Is the project still relevant for enhancing pipeline safety and or protecting the environment? 4.7 Very Effective
  1.2. Does the project support rulemaking, statutory requirements or inspection activities? 4.6 Very Effective
  1.3. Does the project address a technology gap, consensus standard or produce general knowledge? 4.7 Very Effective
2. Is the project still well managed? 4.6 Very Effective
  2.1. Is the project making progress toward the work scope objectives and the PHMSA goals? 4.7 Very Effective
  2.2. Is the project being managed on budget and schedule? 4.5 Very Effective
3. What approaches are taken in transferring results to end users? 4.5 Very Effective
  3.1. Is there a plan for dissemination of results, including publications, reporting, and patents? 4.6 Very Effective
  3.2. How much end user involvement is incorporated into the work scope? 4.5 Very Effective
  3.3. For results that may include marketable products and technologies, are commercialization plans established? 4.6 Very Effective
4. Is the project well coordinated with other closely related programs? 4.5 Very Effective
  4.1. Does the project build on, or make use of, related or prior work? 4.6 Very Effective
  4.2. Is the work of the project being communicated to other related research efforts? 4.4 Effective
  4.3. Has consideration been given to possible future work? 4.4 Effective
5. Is the project producing high quality results? 4.6 Very Effective
  5.1. Are the intended results supported by the work performed during the project? 4.6 Very Effective
  5.2. Are the intended results consistent with scientific knowledge and/or engineering principles? 4.7 Very Effective
  5.3. Are the intended results appropriate for the resources expended? 4.5 Very Effective
  5.4. Are the intended results presented in such a manner as to be useful for identified end users? 4.5 Very Effective
Average Category Score and Rating: 4.6 Very Effective

Project Rankings
Project Rank Contract Project Title Score Rating
176 1 DTPH56-05-T-0001 Understanding Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Signals from Mechanical Damage in Pipelines 4.9 Very Effective
225 1 DTPH56-07-T-000005 Update of Weld Design, Testing, and Assessment Procedures for High Strength Pipelines 4.9 Very Effective
235 1 DTPH56-08-T-000009 Meandering Winding Magnetometer-Array Detection & Characterization of Damage through Coatings and Insulation 4.9 Very Effective
236 1 DTPH56-08-T-000009 Adaptation of MWM Array and MFL Technology for Enhanced Detection/Characterization of Damage from Inside Pipelines 4.9 Very Effective
238 1 DTPH56-08-T-000011 Structural Significance of Mechanical Damage 4.9 Very Effective
247 1 DTPH56-08-T-000013 Effect of Ethanol Blends and Batching Operations on Stress Corrosion Cracking of Carbon Steel 4.9 Very Effective
246 2 DTPH56-08-T-000013 Effect of Ethanol Source on Stress Corrosion Cracking of Carbon Steel 4.8 Very Effective
257 2 DTPH56-08-T-000023 Validation for Flaw Acceptance of Mechanical Damage to Low Stress Natural Gas Pipelines 4.8 Very Effective
200 3 DTPH56-06-T-000014 Validation and Documentation of Tensile Strain Limit Design Models for Pipelines 4.7 Very Effective
201 3 DTPH56-06-T-000014 Second Generation Models for Strain-Based Design 4.7 Very Effective
212 3 DTPH56-06-T-000023 Effect of Surface Preparation on Residual Stress in Multi-layer and Other Pipeline Coatings 4.7 Very Effective
221 3 DTPH56-07-T-000010 Butt Fusion Joint Integrity and Evaluation of NDE Technologies 4.7 Very Effective
224 3 DTPH56-07-T-000009 In-Situ Hydrogen Analysis in Weldments: Novel NDE for Weld Inspection 4.7 Very Effective
226 3 DTPH56-07-T-000005 Development of Optimized Welding Solutions for X100 Linepipe Steel 4.7 Very Effective
231 3 DTPH56-08-T-000002 Enhanced Defect Detection and Sizing Accuracy Using Matrix Phased Array Ultrasonics Tools 4.7 Very Effective
232 3 DTPH56-08-T-000004 Improving Magnetic Flux Leakage In-Line Inspection Corrosion Sizing Using Phased Array Guided Ultrasonic Waves 4.7 Very Effective
233 3 DTPH56-08-T-000006 The Effect of Cathodic Protection on Stress Corrosion Cracking of High-Strength Pipeline Steels 4.7 Very Effective
239 3 DTPH56-08-T-000005 Development and demonstration of an integrated tool for mapping, sizing and evaluation of SCC for remaining strength prediction 4.7 Very Effective
240 3 DTPH56-08-T-000014 Effect of Concentration and Temperature of Ethanol in Fuel Blends on Microbial and Stress Corrosion Cracking of Pipeline Steels 4.7 Very Effective
244 3 DTPH56-08-T-000015 Pipeline Segment-Specific External Corrosion Rate Estimation to Improve Reassessment Interval Accuracy 4.7 Very Effective
245 3 DTPH56-08-T-000016 Evaluation and Method for Qualification of Fiber Reinforced Composite Repair Techniques for Transmission and/or Distribution Pipelines 4.7 Very Effective
250 3 DTPH56-08-T-000018 Pipeline Quality Biogas: Guidance Document for Dairy Waste, Wastewater Treatment Sludge and Landfill Conversion 4.7 Very Effective
251 3 DTPH56-08-T-000008 Achieving Maximum Crack Remediation Effect from Optimized Hydrotesting 4.7 Very Effective
256 3 DTPH56-08-T-000022 Validation of External Corrosion Growth-Rate Using Polarization Resistance and Soil Properties 4.7 Very Effective
220 4 DTPH56-07-T-000006 Validation of Assessment Methods for Production Scale Girth Welding of High Strength Pipelines with Multiple Pipe Sources 4.6 Very Effective
222 4 DTPH56-07-T-000007 Hybrid Laser Arc Welding (HLAW) System Development for Pipeline Construction 4.6 Very Effective
230 4 DTPH56-08-T-000003 Development of Tools to Estimate Actual Corrosion Growth Rates (Internal and External) of Gas Pipelines 4.6 Very Effective
248 4 DTPH56-08-T-000013 Monitoring Conditions Leading to SCC/Corrosion of Carbon Steel 4.6 Very Effective
252 4 DTPH56-08-T-000019 Advanced Development of Proactive Infrasonic Gas Pipeline Evaluation Network 4.6 Very Effective
210 5 DTPH56-06-T-000021 Method for Qualification of Coatings Applied to Wet Surfaces 4.5 Very Effective
218 5 DTPH56-07-T-000002 Advanced Technologies and Methodology for Automated Ultrasonic Testing Systems Quantification 4.5 Very Effective
223 5 DTPH56-07-T-000008 Automated Laser Ultrasonic Testing (ALUT) Of Hybrid Laser Arc Welds For Pipeline Construction 4.5 Very Effective
254 5 DTPH56-08-T-000021 Feasibility of Using Plastic Pipe for Ethanol Low Stress Lines 4.5 Very Effective
255 5 DTPH56-08-T-000020 Internal Corrosion Detection in Liquids Pipelines 4.5 Very Effective
216 6 DTPH56-07-T-000004 Development of HAZ Hardness Limits for In-Service Welding 4.3 More than Effective
258 6 DTPH56-08-T-000024 Broadband Electromagnetic Technology Sensor to Assess Ferrous Pipes without Removing Coatings in Both Traditional and Keyhole Excavations 4.3 More than Effective
219 7 DTPH56-07-T-000003 Hybrid Laser/GMAW of High Strength Steel Gas Transmission Pipelines 4.2 More than Effective
234 7 DTPH56-08-T-000007 Development of a Free-Swimming Acoustic Tool for Liquid Pipeline Leak Detection Including Evaluation for Natural Gas Pipeline Applications 4.2 More than Effective
237 7 DTPH56-08-T-000010 Direct strain measurements and failure pressure prediction in mechanically damaged and strained pipes 4.2 More than Effective
243 8 DTPH56-08-T-000012 External Corrosion Direct Assessment - Potential Measurements on Paved Areas 3.9 More than Effective
241 9 DTPH56-08-T-000012 External Corrosion Direct Assessment of Cased Pipes 3.8 More than Effective
242 10 DTPH56-08-T-000012 Severity Ranking of ECDA Indirect Inspection Indications 3.5 More than Effective