Phmsa Triskelion Logo United States Department of Transportation

Alternate Welding Processes for In-service Welding

Overview

Fast Facts

Project No. 131
Contract No. DTRS56-03-T-0010
Research Award Recipient BMT Fleet Technology Limited 311 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, Canada, K2K 1Z8 Kanata, ON K2G 0H2
AOR James Merritt
Researcher Contact Info Darren Begg Mgr, Welding Technology (613) 592-2830, ext 229 311 Legget Drive Kanata, ON K2K 1Z8 dbegg@fleetech.com http://www.fleetech.com/
Peer Review More than Effective

Financial and Status Data

Project Status Closed
Start Fiscal Year 2003 (09/09/2003)
End Fiscal Year 2008 (11/30/2007)
PHMSA $$ Budgeted $181,000.00

Main Objective

Project is to support efforts towards the development and application of procedures for welding on in-service pipelines using alternate welding processes.

Public Abstract

Conducting weld repairs and attaching hot tap tees onto pressurized pipes has the advantage of avoiding loss of service and revenue. However, the risks involved with in-service welding need to be managed by ensuring that welding is performed in a reproducible and consistent manner within an optimal heat input window. The optimal heat input window avoids burn-through (upper limit of heat input) and weld faults or hydrogen induced cold cracking (lower limit of heat input). Welding on live pipelines has been successfully performed for years, using mainly the shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. Over the past 25 years, failures have occurred in welds deposited on in-service pipelines, and these failures have been attributed to weldment hydrogen cracking, and inconsistent bead size or penetration profile. Numerous investigations have been completed to address the most significant in-service welding hazards, namely burn-through and hydrogen-induced cracking. Weld procedures designed to avoid burn-through and hydrogen cracking consider primarily the thermal cycle, while pipe chemistry and internal pressure are additional influencing parameters for delayed cracking and burn-through, respectively. The thermal cycle itself depends on the welding heat energy input, heat sink capacity of the pipeline (pipe wall thickness, fluid type and flow rate), and any preheat or post heat applied.

Relevant Files & Links

Final Report

5637CFR KSDB24Apr09.pdf

5637CFR_KSDB24Apr09.pdf

APPENDIX A.pdf

APPENDIX_A.pdf

APPENDIX B.pdf

APPENDIX_B.pdf

APPENDIX C.pdf

APPENDIX_C.pdf

APPENDIX D.pdf

APPENDIX_D.pdf

APPENDIX E.pdf

APPENDIX_E.pdf

APPENDIX F.pdf

APPENDIX_F.pdf

APPENDIX G.pdf

APPENDIX_G.pdf

APPENDIX H.pdf

APPENDIX_H.pdf

APPENDIX I.pdf

APPENDIX_I.pdf

APPENDIX J.pdf

APPENDIX_J.pdf

APPENDIX K.pdf

APPENDIX_K.pdf

APPENDIX L.pdf

APPENDIX_L.pdf

APPENDIX M.pdf

APPENDIX_M.pdf

APPENDIX N.pdf

APPENDIX_N.pdf