PHMSA Gas Transmission (GT) Integrity Management
Time: 05/19/2013 12:22 AM

Protocol Item C.01

C.01 Threat Identification

Verify that the operator identifies and evaluates all potential threats to each covered pipeline segment. [§192.917(a)]

  1. If the operator is following the prescriptive or performance-related approaches, verify that the following categories of failure have been considered and evaluated: [§192.917(a) and ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 2.2]
    1. external corrosion,
    2. internal corrosion,
    3. stress corrosion cracking;
    4. manufacturing-related defects, including the use of low frequency electric resistance welded (ERW) pipe, lap welded pipe, flash welded pipe, or other pipe potentially susceptible to manufacturing defects [§192.917(e)(4) and ASME B31.8S-2004, Appendix A4.3];
    5. welding- or fabrication-related defects,
    6. equipment failures;
    7. third party/mechanical damage [§192.917(e)(1)],
    8. incorrect operations (including human error),
    9. weather-related and outside force damage,
    10. cyclic fatigue or other loading condition [§192.917(e)(2)],
    11. all other potential threats.
  1. If the operator is following the performance-based approach, verify that all 21 of the threats associated with the first nine failure categories listed above have been considered. [§192.917(a) and ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 2.2]

  1. Verify that the operator's threat identification has considered interactive threats from different categories (e.g., manufacturing defects activated by pressure cycling, corrosion accelerated by third party or outside force damage) [ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 2.2].

  1. Verify that the approach incorporates appropriate criteria for eliminating a specific threat for a particular pipeline segment. [ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 5.10]

Related Rule Sections:

Related Topics:

PHMSA Home | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA