Question: What level of detail does OPS expect to see in initial IM frameworks for each of the required program elements?
Answer: The level of detail in the framework will vary depending on the level of maturity of each program element. In general, OPS expects that elements that must be implemented early will have considerable detail. This includes identification of all high consequence areas, threat identification, and baseline assessment plans. The description in the framework of elements that will be implemented later may be more sketchy. These include a continual process for evaluation and assessment, process for adding preventive and mitigative measures, and plans for confirmatory direct assessment. OPS would expect a reasonably complete description of the elements that relate to managing the IM program, e.g., quality assurance, management of change, and record keeping, although the IM program descriptions of these elements may become more detailed as experience is gained.
OPS would find unacceptable a situation in which a program element was being actively implemented but little or no description of that element is included in the IM framework/program. Program elements should be thought out, documented, and receive the internal approvals the operator considers necessary before they are implemented.
| Inspections |
| Home Page |
| Reference |
| FAQ |
| Key Documents |
| Protocols |
| Topical Index |
| Glossary |
| Rule Outline |
| In Context |
| Print-Friendly |
| My Pages |
| Questions and Comments |
| Log In... |